![]() Police were historically unable to follow every resident with a police car, but with new surveillance technologies they may be able to effectively accomplish the same goal albeit in a less disruptive manner. However, surveillance technology is producing a significant expansion of police capabilities. In the past, police surveillance of public spaces was constrained by resources such as availability of police officers. Site authored by Jennifer Helsby, Yoni Maltsman, and Freddy Martinez, designed by studiothreadĬhicago residents have legitimate questions surrounding the use of these technologies: Are appropriate policies and procedures in place to ensure these systems are responsibly used? To what degree are these systems necessary or even useful? Do the benefits of these systems justify the tens of millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on them? Do members of the public want this level of surveillance to be used? If you are able, please consider donating. If you'd like to contribute, please contact us. We'll be updating this intro as we learn more through our ongoing investigations. This intro to police surveillance technologies was produced from ongoing research through FOIA documents acquired by Lucy Parsons Labs as well as some public data. Here we survey the major parts of the surveillance system in Chicago with respect to costs, capabilities, efficacy, and legal and privacy concerns. However, many Chicago residents are unaware of the scope of the surveillance systems, their huge cost, and the privacy implications of their use. #POLICE CHICAGO LICENSE#Cameras, automatic license plate readers, cell site simulators and many other surveillance devices are currently used in the city by the Chicago Police Department and its sister agencies. Chicago is one of the most heavily surveilled cities in the world. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |